use http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/notes/hsb2.dta, clear
generate hon=write>=60 /* create binary response variable */
logit hon female, nolog
Logit estimates Number of obs = 200
LR chi2(1) = 3.94
Prob > chi2 = 0.0473
Log likelihood = -113.6769 Pseudo R2 = 0.0170
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
hon | Coef. Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf. Interval]
-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
female | .6513707 .3336752 1.95 0.051 -.0026207 1.305362
_cons | -1.400088 .2631619 -5.32 0.000 -1.915876 -.8842998
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
lroc, nograph
Logistic model for hon
number of observations = 200
area under ROC curve = 0.5785
predict xb1, xb /* create linear predictor for model 1 */
logit hon female read, nolog
Logit estimates Number of obs = 200
LR chi2(2) = 60.40
Prob > chi2 = 0.0000
Log likelihood = -85.44372 Pseudo R2 = 0.2612
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
hon | Coef. Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf. Interval]
-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
female | 1.120926 .4081028 2.75 0.006 .321059 1.920793
read | .1443657 .0233337 6.19 0.000 .0986325 .1900989
_cons | -9.603365 1.426404 -6.73 0.000 -12.39906 -6.807665
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
lroc, nograph
Logistic model for hon
number of observations = 200
area under ROC curve = 0.8330
predict xb2, xb /* create linear predictor for model 2 */
We have run two different models and have areas under the ROC curve of .5785 and .8330.
Next, we will use the two linear predictors with the roccomp command to get a test of the
differences in area under the ROC curve.
roccomp hon xb1 xb2, graph summary
ROC -Asymptotic Normal--
Obs Area Std. Err. [95% Conf. Interval]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
xb1 200 0.5785 0.0254 0.52870 0.62828
xb2 200 0.8330 0.0305 0.77329 0.89274
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ho: area(xb1) = area(xb2)
chi2(1) = 50.18 Prob>chi2 = 0.0000

Using roccomp with linear predictors from logistic regression will work with both nested and non-nested models.
Thanks to Sid Port for suggesting this approach.
ReferenceMario A. Cleves,
From the help desk: Comparing areas under
receiver operating characteristic curves from
two or more probit or logit models, The Stata Journal (2002) 2,
No. 3, pp 301-313.
The content of this web site should not be construed as an endorsement of any particular web site, book, or software product by the University of California.