SPSS Textbook Examples
Applied Regression Analysis by John Fox
Chapter 15: Logit and probit models
page 440 Figure 15.1 Scatterplot of voting intention (1 represents yes,
0 represents no) by a scale of support for the status quo, for a sample of Chilean voters surveyed prior to the 1988 plebiscite. The points are
jittered vertically to minimize overlapping. The solid straight line shows the linear least-squares fit; the solid curved line shows the fit of the
logistic regression model; the broken line represents a lowess nonparametric regression.
NOTE: SPSS will not allow the multiple regression lines to be placed on a
single graph. Also, we do not know how to do a lowess non-parametric regression in SPSS.
GET FILE='D:\chile.sav'.
if intvote = 1 voting = 1.
if intvote = 2 voting = 0.
IGRAPH
/X1 = VAR(statquo)
/Y = VAR (voting)
/FITLINE METHOD = REGRESSION LINEAR LINE = TOTAL
/SCATTER COINCIDENT = NONE.
page 452 Table 15.1 Deviances (-2 log likelihood) for several models
fit to the women's labor force participation data. The following code is used for terms in the models: C constant; I husband's income; K presence
of children; R region. The column labeled K + 1 gives the number of regressors in the model, including the constant.
GET FILE='D:\womenlf.sav'.
if workstat = 1 or workstat = 2 ws = 1.
if workstat = 0 ws = 0.
compute ik = husbinc*chilpres.
compute cons = 1.
compute rgn1 = 0.
if region = "Atlantic" rgn1 = 1.
compute rgn2 = 0.
if region = "BC" rgn2 = 1.
compute rgn3 = 0.
if region = "Ontario" rgn3 = 1.
compute rgn4 = 0.
if region = "Prairie" rgn4 = 1.
compute rgn5 = 0.
if region = "Quebec" rgn5 = 1.
execute.
model 0 with C:
NOTE: SPSS will not allow a regression without a predictor.
(i.e., just the constant). Therefore, you need to create a variable - here we created
const. Then we entered our constant with the /noconst
subcommand, which, in effect, gives us a model with just a constant.
LOGISTIC REGRESSION VAR=ws
/METHOD=ENTER cons
/noconst.
Case Processing Summary
| Unweighted Cases(a) |
N |
Percent |
| Selected Cases |
Included in Analysis |
263 |
100.0 |
| Missing Cases |
0 |
.0 |
| Total |
263 |
100.0 |
| Unselected Cases |
0 |
.0 |
| Total |
263 |
100.0 |
| a If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases.
|
Dependent Variable Encoding
| Original Value |
Internal Value |
| .00 |
0 |
| 1.00 |
1 |
Classification Table(a,b,c)
|
Predicted |
| WS |
Percentage Correct |
| Observed |
.00 |
1.00 |
| Step 0 |
WS |
.00 |
0 |
155 |
.0 |
| 1.00 |
0 |
108 |
100.0 |
| Overall Percentage |
|
|
41.1 |
| a No terms in the model. |
| b Initial Log-likelihood Function: -2 Log Likelihood = 364.595 |
| c The cut value is .500
|
Variables not in the Equation
|
Score |
df |
Sig. |
| Step 0 |
Variables |
CONS |
8.399 |
1 |
.004 |
| Overall Statistics |
8.399 |
1 |
.004 |
Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients
|
Chi-square |
df |
Sig. |
| Step 1 |
Step |
8.445 |
1 |
.004 |
| Block |
8.445 |
1 |
.004 |
| Model |
8.445 |
1 |
.004 |
Model Summary
| Step |
-2 Log likelihood |
Cox & Snell R Square |
Nagelkerke R Square |
| 1 |
356.151 |
.032 |
.042 |
Classification Table(a)
|
Predicted |
| WS |
Percentage Correct |
| Observed |
.00 |
1.00 |
| Step 1 |
WS |
.00 |
155 |
0 |
100.0 |
| 1.00 |
108 |
0 |
.0 |
| Overall Percentage |
|
|
58.9 |
| a The cut value is .500
|
Variables in the Equation
|
B |
S.E. |
Wald |
df |
Sig. |
Exp(B) |
| Step 1(a) |
CONS |
-.361 |
.125 |
8.308 |
1 |
.004 |
.697 |
| a Variable(s) entered on step 1: CONS.
|
model 1 with C, I, K, R, I*K:
LOGISTIC REGRESSION VAR=ws
/METHOD=ENTER husbinc chilpres rgn2 rgn3 rgn4 rgn5 ik.
Case Processing Summary
| Unweighted Cases(a) |
N |
Percent |
| Selected Cases |
Included in Analysis |
263 |
100.0 |
| Missing Cases |
0 |
.0 |
| Total |
263 |
100.0 |
| Unselected Cases |
0 |
.0 |
| Total |
263 |
100.0 |
| a If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases.
|
Dependent Variable Encoding
| Original Value |
Internal Value |
| .00 |
0 |
| 1.00 |
1 |
Classification Table(a,b)
|
Predicted |
| WS |
Percentage Correct |
| Observed |
.00 |
1.00 |
| Step 0 |
WS |
.00 |
155 |
0 |
100.0 |
| 1.00 |
108 |
0 |
.0 |
| Overall Percentage |
|
|
58.9 |
| a Constant is included in the model. |
| b The cut value is .500
|
Variables in the Equation
|
B |
S.E. |
Wald |
df |
Sig. |
Exp(B) |
| Step 0 |
Constant |
-.361 |
.125 |
8.308 |
1 |
.004 |
.697 |
Variables not in the Equation
|
Score |
df |
Sig. |
| Step 0 |
Variables |
HUSBINC |
4.928 |
1 |
.026 |
| CHILPRES |
31.599 |
1 |
.000 |
| RGN2 |
1.530 |
1 |
.216 |
| RGN3 |
.008 |
1 |
.929 |
| RGN4 |
.244 |
1 |
.622 |
| RGN5 |
.242 |
1 |
.623 |
| IK |
25.164 |
1 |
.000 |
| Overall Statistics |
38.657 |
7 |
.000 |
Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients
|
Chi-square |
df |
Sig. |
| Step 1 |
Step |
39.609 |
7 |
.000 |
| Block |
39.609 |
7 |
.000 |
| Model |
39.609 |
7 |
.000 |
Model Summary
| Step |
-2 Log likelihood |
Cox & Snell R Square |
Nagelkerke R Square |
| 1 |
316.542 |
.140 |
.188 |
Classification Table(a)
|
Predicted |
| WS |
Percentage Correct |
| Observed |
.00 |
1.00 |
| Step 1 |
WS |
.00 |
135 |
20 |
87.1 |
| 1.00 |
58 |
50 |
46.3 |
| Overall Percentage |
|
|
70.3 |
| a The cut value is .500
|
Variables in the Equation
|
B |
S.E. |
Wald |
df |
Sig. |
Exp(B) |
| Step 1(a) |
HUSBINC |
-.068 |
.034 |
4.094 |
1 |
.043 |
.934 |
| CHILPRES |
-2.139 |
.692 |
9.567 |
1 |
.002 |
.118 |
| RGN2 |
.331 |
.585 |
.320 |
1 |
.571 |
1.392 |
| RGN3 |
.183 |
.466 |
.154 |
1 |
.694 |
1.201 |
| RGN4 |
.469 |
.557 |
.709 |
1 |
.400 |
1.599 |
| RGN5 |
-.203 |
.502 |
.163 |
1 |
.686 |
.816 |
| IK |
.036 |
.041 |
.755 |
1 |
.385 |
1.037 |
| Constant |
1.625 |
.698 |
5.414 |
1 |
.020 |
5.078 |
| a Variable(s) entered on step 1: HUSBINC, CHILPRES, RGN2, RGN3, RGN4, RGN5, IK.
|
model 2 with C, I, K, R:
LOGISTIC REGRESSION VAR=ws
/METHOD=ENTER husbinc chilpres rgn2 rgn3 rgn4 rgn5.
Case Processing Summary
| Unweighted Cases(a) |
N |
Percent |
| Selected Cases |
Included in Analysis |
263 |
100.0 |
| Missing Cases |
0 |
.0 |
| Total |
263 |
100.0 |
| Unselected Cases |
0 |
.0 |
| Total |
263 |
100.0 |
| a If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases.
|
Dependent Variable Encoding
| Original Value |
Internal Value |
| .00 |
0 |
| 1.00 |
1 |
Classification Table(a,b)
|
Predicted |
| WS |
Percentage Correct |
| Observed |
.00 |
1.00 |
| Step 0 |
WS |
.00 |
155 |
0 |
100.0 |
| 1.00 |
108 |
0 |
.0 |
| Overall Percentage |
|
|
58.9 |
| a Constant is included in the model. |
| b The cut value is .500
|
Variables in the Equation
|
B |
S.E. |
Wald |
df |
Sig. |
Exp(B) |
| Step 0 |
Constant |
-.361 |
.125 |
8.308 |
1 |
.004 |
.697 |
Variables not in the Equation
|
Score |
df |
Sig. |
| Step 0 |
Variables |
HUSBINC |
4.928 |
1 |
.026 |
| CHILPRES |
31.599 |
1 |
.000 |
| RGN2 |
1.530 |
1 |
.216 |
| RGN3 |
.008 |
1 |
.929 |
| RGN4 |
.244 |
1 |
.622 |
| RGN5 |
.242 |
1 |
.623 |
| Overall Statistics |
37.765 |
6 |
.000 |
Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients
|
Chi-square |
df |
Sig. |
| Step 1 |
Step |
38.850 |
6 |
.000 |
| Block |
38.850 |
6 |
.000 |
| Model |
38.850 |
6 |
.000 |
Model Summary
| Step |
-2 Log likelihood |
Cox & Snell R Square |
Nagelkerke R Square |
| 1 |
317.301 |
.137 |
.185 |
Classification Table(a)
|
Predicted |
| WS |
Percentage Correct |
| Observed |
.00 |
1.00 |
| Step 1 |
WS |
.00 |
132 |
23 |
85.2 |
| 1.00 |
55 |
53 |
49.1 |
| Overall Percentage |
|
|
70.3 |
| a The cut value is .500
|
Variables in the Equation
|
B |
S.E. |
Wald |
df |
Sig. |
Exp(B) |
| Step 1(a) |
HUSBINC |
-.045 |
.021 |
4.857 |
1 |
.028 |
.956 |
| CHILPRES |
-1.604 |
.302 |
28.245 |
1 |
.000 |
.201 |
| RGN2 |
.342 |
.585 |
.342 |
1 |
.559 |
1.408 |
| RGN3 |
.188 |
.468 |
.161 |
1 |
.688 |
1.207 |
| RGN4 |
.472 |
.557 |
.718 |
1 |
.397 |
1.603 |
| RGN5 |
-.173 |
.500 |
.120 |
1 |
.729 |
.841 |
| Constant |
1.268 |
.553 |
5.256 |
1 |
.022 |
3.553 |
| a Variable(s) entered on step 1: HUSBINC, CHILPRES, RGN2, RGN3, RGN4, RGN5.
|
model 3 with C, I, K, I*K:
LOGISTIC REGRESSION VAR=ws
/METHOD=ENTER husbinc chilpres ik.
Case Processing Summary
| Unweighted Cases(a) |
N |
Percent |
| Selected Cases |
Included in Analysis |
263 |
100.0 |
| Missing Cases |
0 |
.0 |
| Total |
263 |
100.0 |
| Unselected Cases |
0 |
.0 |
| Total |
263 |
100.0 |
| a If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases.
|
Dependent Variable Encoding
| Original Value |
Internal Value |
| .00 |
0 |
| 1.00 |
1 |
Classification Table(a,b)
|
Predicted |
| WS |
Percentage Correct |
| Observed |
.00 |
1.00 |
| Step 0 |
WS |
.00 |
155 |
0 |
100.0 |
| 1.00 |
108 |
0 |
.0 |
| Overall Percentage |
|
|
58.9 |
| a Constant is included in the model. |
| b The cut value is .500
|
Variables in the Equation
|
B |
S.E. |
Wald |
df |
Sig. |
Exp(B) |
| Step 0 |
Constant |
-.361 |
.125 |
8.308 |
1 |
.004 |
.697 |
Variables not in the Equation
|
Score |
df |
Sig. |
| Step 0 |
Variables |
HUSBINC |
4.928 |
1 |
.026 |
| CHILPRES |
31.599 |
1 |
.000 |
| IK |
25.164 |
1 |
.000 |
| Overall Statistics |
36.471 |
3 |
.000 |
Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients
|
Chi-square |
df |
Sig. |
| Step 1 |
Step |
37.027 |
3 |
.000 |
| Block |
37.027 |
3 |
.000 |
| Model |
37.027 |
3 |
.000 |
Model Summary
| Step |
-2 Log likelihood |
Cox & Snell R Square |
Nagelkerke R Square |
| 1 |
319.124 |
.131 |
.177 |
Classification Table(a)
|
Predicted |
| WS |
Percentage Correct |
| Observed |
.00 |
1.00 |
| Step 1 |
WS |
.00 |
133 |
22 |
85.8 |
| 1.00 |
59 |
49 |
45.4 |
| Overall Percentage |
|
|
69.2 |
| a The cut value is .500
|
Variables in the Equation
|
B |
S.E. |
Wald |
df |
Sig. |
Exp(B) |
| Step 1(a) |
HUSBINC |
-.062 |
.033 |
3.604 |
1 |
.058 |
.940 |
| CHILPRES |
-2.046 |
.677 |
9.134 |
1 |
.003 |
.129 |
| IK |
.032 |
.041 |
.605 |
1 |
.437 |
1.032 |
| Constant |
1.640 |
.558 |
8.646 |
1 |
.003 |
5.153 |
| a Variable(s) entered on step 1: HUSBINC, CHILPRES, IK.
|
model 4 with C, I, R:
LOGISTIC REGRESSION VAR=ws
/METHOD=ENTER husbinc rgn2 rgn3 rgn4 rgn5.
Case Processing Summary
| Unweighted Cases(a) |
N |
Percent |
| Selected Cases |
Included in Analysis |
263 |
100.0 |
| Missing Cases |
0 |
.0 |
| Total |
263 |
100.0 |
| Unselected Cases |
0 |
.0 |
| Total |
263 |
100.0 |
| a If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases.
|
Dependent Variable Encoding
| Original Value |
Internal Value |
| .00 |
0 |
| 1.00 |
1 |
Classification Table(a,b)
|
Predicted |
| WS |
Percentage Correct |
| Observed |
.00 |
1.00 |
| Step 0 |
WS |
.00 |
155 |
0 |
100.0 |
| 1.00 |
108 |
0 |
.0 |
| Overall Percentage |
|
|
58.9 |
| a Constant is included in the model. |
| b The cut value is .500
|
Variables in the Equation
|
B |
S.E. |
Wald |
df |
Sig. |
Exp(B) |
| Step 0 |
Constant |
-.361 |
.125 |
8.308 |
1 |
.004 |
.697 |
Variables not in the Equation
|
Score |
df |
Sig. |
| Step 0 |
Variables |
HUSBINC |
4.928 |
1 |
.026 |
| RGN2 |
1.530 |
1 |
.216 |
| RGN3 |
.008 |
1 |
.929 |
| RGN4 |
.244 |
1 |
.622 |
| RGN5 |
.242 |
1 |
.623 |
| Overall Statistics |
8.011 |
5 |
.156 |
Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients
|
Chi-square |
df |
Sig. |
| Step 1 |
Step |
8.302 |
5 |
.140 |
| Block |
8.302 |
5 |
.140 |
| Model |
8.302 |
5 |
.140 |
Model Summary
| Step |
-2 Log likelihood |
Cox & Snell R Square |
Nagelkerke R Square |
| 1 |
347.849 |
.031 |
.042 |
Classification Table(a)
|
Predicted |
| WS |
Percentage Correct |
| Observed |
.00 |
1.00 |
| Step 1 |
WS |
.00 |
141 |
14 |
91.0 |
| 1.00 |
87 |
21 |
19.4 |
| Overall Percentage |
|
|
61.6 |
| a The cut value is .500
|
Variables in the Equation
|
B |
S.E. |
Wald |
df |
Sig. |
Exp(B) |
| Step 1(a) |
HUSBINC |
-.045 |
.019 |
5.435 |
1 |
.020 |
.956 |
| RGN2 |
.858 |
.545 |
2.476 |
1 |
.116 |
2.359 |
| RGN3 |
.458 |
.444 |
1.060 |
1 |
.303 |
1.580 |
| RGN4 |
.466 |
.535 |
.760 |
1 |
.383 |
1.594 |
| RGN5 |
.204 |
.469 |
.190 |
1 |
.663 |
1.227 |
| Constant |
-.093 |
.463 |
.040 |
1 |
.841 |
.911 |
| a Variable(s) entered on step 1: HUSBINC, RGN2, RGN3, RGN4, RGN5.
|
model 5: with C, K, R:
LOGISTIC REGRESSION VAR=ws
/METHOD=ENTER chilpres rgn2 rgn3 rgn4 rgn5.
Case Processing Summary
| Unweighted Cases(a) |
N |
Percent |
| Selected Cases |
Included in Analysis |
263 |
100.0 |
| Missing Cases |
0 |
.0 |
| Total |
263 |
100.0 |
| Unselected Cases |
0 |
.0 |
| Total |
263 |
100.0 |
| a If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases.
|
Dependent Variable Encoding
| Original Value |
Internal Value |
| .00 |
0 |
| 1.00 |
1 |
Classification Table(a,b)
|
Predicted |
| WS |
Percentage Correct |
| Observed |
.00 |
1.00 |
| Step 0 |
WS |
.00 |
155 |
0 |
100.0 |
| 1.00 |
108 |
0 |
.0 |
| Overall Percentage |
|
|
58.9 |
| a Constant is included in the model. |
| b The cut value is .500
|
Variables in the Equation
|
B |
S.E. |
Wald |
df |
Sig. |
Exp(B) |
| Step 0 |
Constant |
-.361 |
.125 |
8.308 |
1 |
.004 |
.697 |
Variables not in the Equation
|
Score |
df |
Sig. |
| Step 0 |
Variables |
CHILPRES |
31.599 |
1 |
.000 |
| RGN2 |
1.530 |
1 |
.216 |
| RGN3 |
.008 |
1 |
.929 |
| RGN4 |
.244 |
1 |
.622 |
| RGN5 |
.242 |
1 |
.623 |
| Overall Statistics |
33.493 |
5 |
.000 |
Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients
|
Chi-square |
df |
Sig. |
| Step 1 |
Step |
33.724 |
5 |
.000 |
| Block |
33.724 |
5 |
.000 |
| Model |
33.724 |
5 |
.000 |
Model Summary
| Step |
-2 Log likelihood |
Cox & Snell R Square |
Nagelkerke R Square |
| 1 |
322.427 |
.120 |
.162 |
Classification Table(a)
|
Predicted |
| WS |
Percentage Correct |
| Observed |
.00 |
1.00 |
| Step 1 |
WS |
.00 |
129 |
26 |
83.2 |
| 1.00 |
55 |
53 |
49.1 |
| Overall Percentage |
|
|
69.2 |
| a The cut value is .500
|
Variables in the Equation
|
B |
S.E. |
Wald |
df |
Sig. |
Exp(B) |
| Step 1(a) |
CHILPRES |
-1.603 |
.298 |
28.905 |
1 |
.000 |
.201 |
| RGN2 |
.241 |
.576 |
.174 |
1 |
.676 |
1.272 |
| RGN3 |
.042 |
.457 |
.008 |
1 |
.927 |
1.043 |
| RGN4 |
.492 |
.550 |
.798 |
1 |
.372 |
1.635 |
| RGN5 |
-.156 |
.493 |
.100 |
1 |
.752 |
.856 |
| Constant |
.672 |
.476 |
1.988 |
1 |
.159 |
1.958 |
| a Variable(s) entered on step 1: CHILPRES, RGN2, RGN3, RGN4, RGN5.
|
page 452 Table 15.2 Analysis of deviance table for terms in the logit
model fit to the women's labor force participation data.
NOTE: To get the G**2 terms, subtract the deviances.
Model 0 versus model 1: 356.16 - 316.54 = 39.62.
Model 2 versus model 1: 317.30 - 316.54 = .76.
Model 5 versus model 2: 322.44 - 317.30 = 5.14.
Model 4 versus model 2: 347.86 - 317.30 = 30.56.
Model 3 versus model 1: 319.12 - 316.54 = 2.58.
page 453 Figure 15.4 Fitted probability of young married women working
outside the home, as a function of husband's income and presence of children. The solid line shows the logit model fit by maximum
likelihood; the broken line shows the linear least-squares fit.
NOTE: The four lines in Figure 15.4 have been done in separate graphs.
logistic regression var = ws
/method=enter chilpres husbinc
/save pre.
Case Processing Summary
| Unweighted Cases(a) |
N |
Percent |
| Selected Cases |
Included in Analysis |
263 |
100.0 |
| Missing Cases |
0 |
.0 |
| Total |
263 |
100.0 |
| Unselected Cases |
0 |
.0 |
| Total |
263 |
100.0 |
| a If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases.
|
Dependent Variable Encoding
| Original Value |
Internal Value |
| .00 |
0 |
| 1.00 |
1 |
Classification Table(a,b)
|
Predicted |
| WS |
Percentage Correct |
| Observed |
.00 |
1.00 |
| Step 0 |
WS |
.00 |
155 |
0 |
100.0 |
| 1.00 |
108 |
0 |
.0 |
| Overall Percentage |
|
|
58.9 |
| a Constant is included in the model. |
| b The cut value is .500
|
Variables in the Equation
|
B |
S.E. |
Wald |
df |
Sig. |
Exp(B) |
| Step 0 |
Constant |
-.361 |
.125 |
8.308 |
1 |
.004 |
.697 |
Variables not in the Equation
|
Score |
df |
Sig. |
| Step 0 |
Variables |
CHILPRES |
31.599 |
1 |
.000 |
| HUSBINC |
4.928 |
1 |
.026 |
| Overall Statistics |
35.714 |
2 |
.000 |
Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients
|
Chi-square |
df |
Sig. |
| Step 1 |
Step |
36.418 |
2 |
.000 |
| Block |
36.418 |
2 |
.000 |
| Model |
36.418 |
2 |
.000 |
Model Summary
| Step |
-2 Log likelihood |
Cox & Snell R Square |
Nagelkerke R Square |
| 1 |
319.733 |
.129 |
.174 |
Classification Table(a)
|
Predicted |
| WS |
Percentage Correct |
| Observed |
.00 |
1.00 |
| Step 1 |
WS |
.00 |
132 |
23 |
85.2 |
| 1.00 |
55 |
53 |
49.1 |
| Overall Percentage |
|
|
70.3 |
| a The cut value is .500
|
Variables in the Equation
|
B |
S.E. |
Wald |
df |
Sig. |
Exp(B) |
| Step 1(a) |
CHILPRES |
-1.576 |
.292 |
29.065 |
1 |
.000 |
.207 |
| HUSBINC |
-.042 |
.020 |
4.575 |
1 |
.032 |
.959 |
| Constant |
1.336 |
.384 |
12.116 |
1 |
.000 |
3.803 |
| a Variable(s) entered on step 1: CHILPRES, HUSBINC.
|
regression
/dep = ws
/method=enter chilpres husbinc
/save pre.
Variables Entered/Removed(b)
| Model |
Variables Entered |
Variables Removed |
Method |
| 1 |
Husband's income, $1000, Children present(a) |
. |
Enter |
| a All requested variables entered. |
| b Dependent Variable: WS
|
Model Summary(b)
| Model |
R |
R Square |
Adjusted R Square |
Std. Error of the Estimate |
| 1 |
.369(a) |
.136 |
.129 |
.45996 |
| a Predictors: (Constant), Husband's income, $1000, Children present |
| b Dependent Variable: WS
|
ANOVA(b)
| Model |
Sum of Squares |
df |
Mean Square |
F |
Sig. |
| 1 |
Regression |
8.643 |
2 |
4.322 |
20.427 |
.000(a) |
| Residual |
55.007 |
260 |
.212 |
|
|
| Total |
63.650 |
262 |
|
|
|
| a Predictors: (Constant), Husband's income, $1000, Children present |
| b Dependent Variable: WS
|
Coefficients(a)
|
Unstandardized Coefficients |
Standardized Coefficients |
t |
Sig. |
| Model |
B |
Std. Error |
Beta |
| 1 |
(Constant) |
.794 |
.077 |
|
10.350 |
.000 |
| Children present |
-.367 |
.062 |
-.342 |
-5.934 |
.000 |
| Husband's income, $1000 |
-8.538E-03 |
.004 |
-.125 |
-2.170 |
.031 |
| a Dependent Variable: WS
|
Residuals Statistics(a)
|
Minimum |
Maximum |
Mean |
Std. Deviation |
N |
| Predicted Value |
.0421 |
.7851 |
.4106 |
.18163 |
263 |
| Residual |
-.7510 |
.8981 |
.0000 |
.45820 |
263 |
| Std. Predicted Value |
-2.029 |
2.062 |
.000 |
1.000 |
263 |
| Std. Residual |
-1.633 |
1.953 |
.000 |
.996 |
263 |
| a Dependent Variable: WS
|
if chilpres = 1 pw1 = pre_1.
if chilpres = 0 pw2 = pre_1.
if chilpres = 1 lw1 = pre_2.
if chilpres = 0 lw2 = pre_2.
execute.
SORT CASES BY husbinc (A).
IGRAPH
/X1 = VAR(husbinc)
/Y = VAR(pw1)
/LINE(MEAN) STYLE = LINE INTERPOLATE = STRAIGHT.
IGRAPH
/X1 = VAR(husbinc)
/Y = VAR(pw2)
/LINE(MEAN) STYLE = LINE INTERPOLATE = STRAIGHT.
IGRAPH
/X1 = VAR(husbinc)
/Y = VAR(lw1)
/LINE(MEAN) STYLE = LINE INTERPOLATE = STRAIGHT.
IGRAPH
/X1 = VAR(husbinc)
/Y = VAR(lw2)
/LINE(MEAN) STYLE = LINE INTERPOLATE = STRAIGHT.
page 459 Figure 15.5 Partial-residual plot for husband's income in the
women's labor force participation data. The broken line gives the logit fit; the solid line shows a lowess smooth of the plot. Note the four bands
due to the four combinations of values of the dichotomous dependent variable and the dichotomous independent variable presence of children. Because husband's income is also discrete, many points are overplotted.
NOTE: SPSS does not do lowess
smoothing in IGRAPH, so that line is not done. The other two are done on separate graphs.
NOTE: Leverage, studentized residuals and dfbetas are being saved here so that this regression only has to be run once.
logistic regression var=ws
/method=enter chilpres husbinc
/save pre lev sre dfbeta.
Case Processing Summary
| Unweighted Cases(a) |
N |
Percent |
| Selected Cases |
Included in Analysis |
263 |
100.0 |
| Missing Cases |
0 |
.0 |
| Total |
263 |
100.0 |
| Unselected Cases |
0 |
.0 |
| Total |
263 |
100.0 |
| a If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases.
|
Dependent Variable Encoding
| Original Value |
Internal Value |
| .00 |
0 |
| 1.00 |
1 |
Classification Table(a,b)
|
Predicted |
| WS |
Percentage Correct |
| Observed |
.00 |
1.00 |
| Step 0 |
WS |
.00 |
155 |
0 |
100.0 |
| 1.00 |
108 |
0 |
.0 |
| Overall Percentage |
|
|
58.9 |
| a Constant is included in the model. |
| b The cut value is .500
|
Variables in the Equation
|
B |
S.E. |
Wald |
df |
Sig. |
Exp(B) |
| Step 0 |
Constant |
-.361 |
.125 |
8.308 |
1 |
.004 |
.697 |
Variables not in the Equation
|
Score |
df |
Sig. |
| Step 0 |
Variables |
CHILPRES |
31.599 |
1 |
.000 |
| HUSBINC |
4.928 |
1 |
.026 |
| Overall Statistics |
35.714 |
2 |
.000 |
Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients
|
Chi-square |
df |
Sig. |
| Step 1 |
Step |
36.418 |
2 |
.000 |
| Block |
36.418 |
2 |
.000 |
| Model |
36.418 |
2 |
.000 |
Model Summary
| Step |
-2 Log likelihood |
Cox & Snell R Square |
Nagelkerke R Square |
| 1 |
319.733 |
.129 |
.174 |
Classification Table(a)
|
Predicted |
| WS |
Percentage Correct |
| Observed |
.00 |
1.00 |
| Step 1 |
WS |
.00 |
132 |
23 |
85.2 |
| 1.00 |
55 |
53 |
49.1 |
| Overall Percentage |
|
|
70.3 |
| a The cut value is .500
|
Variables in the Equation
|
B |
S.E. |
Wald |
df |
Sig. |
Exp(B) |
| Step 1(a) |
CHILPRES |
-1.576 |
.292 |
29.065 |
1 |
.000 |
.207 |
| HUSBINC |
-.042 |
.020 |
4.575 |
1 |
.032 |
.959 |
| Constant |
1.336 |
.384 |
12.116 |
1 |
.000 |
3.803 |
| a Variable(s) entered on step 1: CHILPRES, HUSBINC.
|
NOTE: pre_3 is generated here.
compute par = (ws-pre_3)/(pre_3*(1-pre_3)) - .0423*husbinc.
regression
/dep=par
/method=enter husbinc
/save pre.
Variables Entered/Removed(b)
| Model |
Variables Entered |
Variables Removed |
Method |
| 1 |
Husband's income, $1000(a) |
. |
Enter |
| a All requested variables entered. |
| b Dependent Variable: PAR
|
Model Summary(b)
| Model |
R |
R Square |
Adjusted R Square |
Std. Error of the Estimate |
| 1 |
.100(a) |
.010 |
.006 |
2.25325 |
| a Predictors: (Constant), Husband's income, $1000 |
| b Dependent Variable: PAR
|
ANOVA(b)
| Model |
Sum of Squares |
df |
Mean Square |
F |
Sig. |
| 1 |
Regression |
13.494 |
1 |
13.494 |
2.658 |
.104(a) |
| Residual |
1325.132 |
261 |
5.077 |
|
|
| Total |
1338.626 |
262 |
|
|
|
| a Predictors: (Constant), Husband's income, $1000 |
| b Dependent Variable: PAR
|
Coefficients(a)
|
Unstandardized Coefficients |
Standardized Coefficients |
t |
Sig. |
| Model |
B |
Std. Error |
Beta |
| 1 |
(Constant) |
-.140 |
.316 |
|
-.443 |
.658 |
| Husband's income, $1000 |
-3.141E-02 |
.019 |
-.100 |
-1.630 |
.104 |
| a Dependent Variable: PAR
|
Casewise Diagnostics(a)
| Case Number |
Std. Residual |
PAR |
| 260 |
3.138 |
5.74 |
| 261 |
3.138 |
5.74 |
| a Dependent Variable: PAR
|
Residuals Statistics(a)
|
Minimum |
Maximum |
Mean |
Std. Deviation |
N |
| Predicted Value |
-1.5536 |
-.1717 |
-.6037 |
.22694 |
263 |
| Residual |
-3.9922 |
7.0705 |
.0000 |
2.24895 |
263 |
| Std. Predicted Value |
-4.186 |
1.904 |
.000 |
1.000 |
263 |
| Std. Residual |
-1.772 |
3.138 |
.000 |
.998 |
263 |
| a Dependent Variable: PAR
|
IGRAPH
/X1 = VAR(husbinc)
/Y = VAR(pre_4)
/LINE(MEAN) STYLE = LINE INTERPOLATE = STRAIGHT.
GRAPH
/SCATTERPLOT(BIVAR)=husbinc WITH par.
page 461 Figure 15.6 Plot of studentized residuals versus hat values
for the logit model fit to the women's labor force participation data. Vertical lines are drawn at twice and three times the average hat value. Many points are overplotted.
logistic regression var=ws
/method=enter chilpres husbinc
/save lev sre dfbeta.
Case Processing Summary
| Unweighted Cases(a) |
N |
Percent |
| Selected Cases |
Included in Analysis |
263 |
100.0 |
| Missing Cases |
0 |
.0 |
| Total |
263 |
100.0 |
| Unselected Cases |
0 |
.0 |
| Total |
263 |
100.0 |
| a If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases.
|
Dependent Variable Encoding
| Original Value |
Internal Value |
| .00 |
0 |
| 1.00 |
1 |
Classification Table(a,b)
|
Predicted |
| WS |
Percentage Correct |
| Observed |
.00 |
1.00 |
| Step 0 |
WS |
.00 |
155 |
0 |
100.0 |
| 1.00 |
108 |
0 |
.0 |
| Overall Percentage |
|
|
58.9 |
| a Constant is included in the model. |
| b The cut value is .500
|
Variables in the Equation
|
B |
S.E. |
Wald |
df |
Sig. |
Exp(B) |
| Step 0 |
Constant |
-.361 |
.125 |
8.308 |
1 |
.004 |
.697 |
Variables not in the Equation
|
Score |
df |
Sig. |
| Step 0 |
Variables |
CHILPRES |
31.599 |
1 |
.000 |
| HUSBINC |
4.928 |
1 |
.026 |
| Overall Statistics |
35.714 |
2 |
.000 |
Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients
|
Chi-square |
df |
Sig. |
| Step 1 |
Step |
36.418 |
2 |
.000 |
| Block |
36.418 |
2 |
.000 |
| Model |
36.418 |
2 |
.000 |
Model Summary
| Step |
-2 Log likelihood |
Cox & Snell R Square |
Nagelkerke R Square |
| 1 |
319.733 |
.129 |
.174 |
Classification Table(a)
|
Predicted |
| WS |
Percentage Correct |
| Observed |
.00 |
1.00 |
| Step 1 |
WS |
.00 |
132 |
23 |
85.2 |
| 1.00 |
55 |
53 |
49.1 |
| Overall Percentage |
|
|
70.3 |
| a The cut value is .500
|
Variables in the Equation
|
B |
S.E. |
Wald |
df |
Sig. |
Exp(B) |
| Step 1(a) |
CHILPRES |
-1.576 |
.292 |
29.065 |
1 |
.000 |
.207 |
| HUSBINC |
-.042 |
.020 |
4.575 |
1 |
.032 |
.959 |
| Constant |
1.336 |
.384 |
12.116 |
1 |
.000 |
3.803 |
| a Variable(s) entered on step 1: CHILPRES, HUSBINC.
|
compute pr = (ws - pre_3)/sqrt(pre_3*(1 - pre_3)).
GRAPH
/SCATTERPLOT(BIVAR)=lev_1 WITH sre_1.
page 462 Figure 15.7 Index plots of approximate influence of each
observation on the coefficients of husband's income and presence of children.
Panel (a)
GRAPH
/SCATTERPLOT(BIVAR)=obs WITH dfb2_1.
Panel (b)
GRAPH
/SCATTERPLOT(BIVAR)=obs WITH dfb1_1.
page 469 Figure 15.8 Fitted probabilities for the polytomous logit model,
showing women's labor force participation as a function of husband's income and presence of children. The upper panel is for children present,
the lower panel for children absent.
NOTE: The scaling of the x-axis is very different than in the text.
Panel (a)
GET FILE='D:\womenlf.sav'.
compute w0 = 0.
if workstat = 0 w0 = 1.
compute w1 = 0.
if workstat = 1 w1 = 1.
compute w2 = 0.
if workstat = 2 w2 = 1.
execute.
logistic regression var=w0
/method=enter husbinc chilpres
/save pre.
Case Processing Summary
| Unweighted Cases(a) |
N |
Percent |
| Selected Cases |
Included in Analysis |
263 |
100.0 |
| Missing Cases |
0 |
.0 |
| Total |
263 |
100.0 |
| Unselected Cases |
0 |
.0 |
| Total |
263 |
100.0 |
| a If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases.
|
Dependent Variable Encoding
| Original Value |
Internal Value |
| .00 |
0 |
| 1.00 |
1 |
Classification Table(a,b)
|
Predicted |
| W0 |
Percentage Correct |
| Observed |
.00 |
1.00 |
| Step 0 |
W0 |
.00 |
0 |
108 |
.0 |
| 1.00 |
0 |
155 |
100.0 |
| Overall Percentage |
|
|
58.9 |
| a Constant is included in the model. |
| b The cut value is .500
|
Variables in the Equation
|
B |
S. |
|---|