|
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
In this chapter, the data set is popular.
Table 4.1
Part 1: The variable sex is a fixed effect, not centered.
proc mixed data = pop ; model popular = sex/solution; random intercept / subject = school type = un; run;
The Mixed Procedure
Covariance Parameter Estimates
Cov Parm Subject Estimate
UN(1,1) SCHOOL 0.8622
Residual 0.4599
Fit Statistics
-2 Res Log Likelihood 4492.9
AIC (smaller is better) 4496.9
AICC (smaller is better) 4496.9
BIC (smaller is better) 4502.1
Null Model Likelihood Ratio Test
DF Chi-Square Pr > ChiSq
1 1728.72 <.0001
Solution for Fixed Effects
Standard
Effect Estimate Error DF t Value Pr > |t|
Intercept 4.8972 0.09530 99 51.39 <.0001
SEX 0.8437 0.03096 1899 27.25 <.0001
Part 2: The variable sex is a fixed effect, raw centered. We first created a centered variable csex for sex.
proc means data = pop mean ;
var sex;
run;
Analysis Variable : SEX pupil sex
Mean
------------
0.4870000
------------
data popc; set pop; csex = sex - .487; run; proc mixed data = popc ; model popular = csex/solution; random intercept / subject = school type = un; run;
The Mixed Procedure
Covariance Parameter Estimates
Cov Parm Subject Estimate
UN(1,1) SCHOOL 0.8622
Residual 0.4599
Fit Statistics
-2 Res Log Likelihood 4492.9
AIC (smaller is better) 4496.9
AICC (smaller is better) 4496.9
BIC (smaller is better) 4502.1
Null Model Likelihood Ratio Test
DF Chi-Square Pr > ChiSq
1 1728.72 <.0001
Solution for Fixed Effects
Standard
Effect Estimate Error DF t Value Pr > |t|
Intercept 5.3081 0.09410 99 56.41 <.0001
csex 0.8437 0.03096 1899 27.25 <.0001
Part 3: The variable sex is included as a random effect.
proc mixed data = pop ; model popular = sex/solution; random intercept sex/ subject = school type = un; run;
Covariance Parameter Estimates
Cov Parm Subject Estimate
UN(1,1) SCHOOL 0.9402
UN(2,1) SCHOOL -0.1410
UN(2,2) SCHOOL 0.2725
Residual 0.3924
Fit Statistics
-2 Res Log Likelihood 4336.3
AIC (smaller is better) 4344.3
AICC (smaller is better) 4344.3
BIC (smaller is better) 4354.7
Null Model Likelihood Ratio Test
DF Chi-Square Pr > ChiSq
3 1885.30 <.0001
Solution for Fixed Effects
Standard
Effect Estimate Error DF t Value Pr > |t|
Intercept 4.8901 0.09901 99 49.39 <.0001
SEX 0.8431 0.05963 99 14.14 <.0001
Part 4: The variable sex is centered and is a random effect.
proc mixed data = popc ; model popular = csex/solution; random intercept csex/ subject = school type = un; run;
Covariance Parameter Estimates
Cov Parm Subject Estimate
UN(1,1) SCHOOL 0.8675
UN(2,1) SCHOOL -0.00825
UN(2,2) SCHOOL 0.2725
Residual 0.3924
Fit Statistics
-2 Res Log Likelihood 4336.3
AIC (smaller is better) 4344.3
AICC (smaller is better) 4344.3
BIC (smaller is better) 4354.7
Null Model Likelihood Ratio Test
DF Chi-Square Pr > ChiSq
3 1885.30 <.0001
Solution for Fixed Effects
Standard
Effect Estimate Error DF t Value Pr > |t|
Intercept 5.3007 0.09424 99 56.25 <.0001
csex 0.8431 0.05963 99 14.14 <.0001
Table 4.2 on page 60.
Part 1: No interaction, no centering.
proc mixed data = pop ; model popular = sex texp /solution; random intercept sex/ subject = school type = un; run;
Covariance Parameter Estimates
Cov Parm Subject Estimate
UN(1,1) SCHOOL 0.4116
UN(2,1) SCHOOL 0.02089
UN(2,2) SCHOOL 0.2733
Residual 0.3925
Fit Statistics
-2 Res Log Likelihood 4275.9
AIC (smaller is better) 4283.9
AICC (smaller is better) 4283.9
BIC (smaller is better) 4294.3
Solution for Fixed Effects
Standard
Effect Estimate Error DF t Value Pr > |t|
Intercept 3.3400 0.1608 98 20.77 <.0001
SEX 0.8431 0.05969 99 14.13 <.0001
TEXP 0.1084 0.01022 1800 10.61 <.0001
Part 2: With interaction, but no centering.
data pop1; set pop; genxexp = sex*texp; run; proc mixed data = pop1 ; model popular = sex texp genxexp/solution; random intercept sex /subject = school type=un ; run;
Covariance Parameter Estimates
Cov Parm Subject Estimate
UN(1,1) SCHOOL 0.4120
UN(2,1) SCHOOL 0.02343
UN(2,2) SCHOOL 0.2264
Residual 0.3924
Fit Statistics
-2 Res Log Likelihood 4268.4
AIC (smaller is better) 4276.4
AICC (smaller is better) 4276.5
BIC (smaller is better) 4286.9
Solution for Fixed Effects
Standard
Effect Estimate Error DF t Value Pr > |t|
Intercept 3.3135 0.1610 98 20.58 <.0001
SEX 1.3296 0.1330 98 9.99 <.0001
TEXP 0.1102 0.01023 1800 10.77 <.0001
genxexp -0.03403 0.008457 1800 -4.02 <.0001
Part 3: Centering, but no interaction. We first created new variables csex and ctexp and their interaction term.
proc means data = pop mean; var sex texp; run; The MEANS Procedure Variable Label Mean ------------------------------------------------------- SEX pupil sex 0.4870000 TEXP teacher experience in years 14.2630000 ------------------------------------------------------- data pop2; set pop; csex = sex - 0.487; ctexp = texp - 14.263; cx = csex*ctexp; run; proc mixed data = pop2 ; model popular = csex ctexp /solution; random intercept csex /subject = school type=un ; run;
Covariance Parameter Estimates
Cov Parm Subject Estimate
UN(1,1) SCHOOL 0.4967
UN(2,1) SCHOOL 0.1540
UN(2,2) SCHOOL 0.2733
Residual 0.3925
Fit Statistics
-2 Res Log Likelihood 4275.9
AIC (smaller is better) 4283.9
AICC (smaller is better) 4283.9
BIC (smaller is better) 4294.3
Solution for Fixed Effects
Standard
Effect Estimate Error DF t Value Pr > |t|
Intercept 5.2960 0.07192 98 73.63 <.0001
csex 0.8431 0.05969 99 14.13 <.0001
ctexp 0.1084 0.01022 1800 10.61 <.0001
Part 4: Centering and with interaction.
proc mixed data = pop2 ; model popular = csex ctexp cx/solution; random intercept csex /subject = school type=un ; run;
Covariance Parameter Estimates
Cov Parm Subject Estimate
UN(1,1) SCHOOL 0.4885
UN(2,1) SCHOOL 0.1337
UN(2,2) SCHOOL 0.2264
Residual 0.3924
Fit Statistics
-2 Res Log Likelihood 4268.4
AIC (smaller is better) 4276.4
AICC (smaller is better) 4276.5
BIC (smaller is better) 4286.9
Solution for Fixed Effects
Standard
Effect Estimate Error DF t Value Pr > |t|
Intercept 5.2969 0.07135 98 74.24 <.0001
csex 0.8442 0.05562 98 15.18 <.0001
ctexp 0.09366 0.01085 1800 8.63 <.0001
cx -0.03403 0.008457 1800 -4.02 <.0001
Figure 4.3. Regression lines for popularity of girls and boys, predicted by teacher experience, texp.
This uses model in Part 2 of Table 4.2. We will have to manually create the predicted values by the fixed part of the model.
data fig4_3;
set pop1;
pred = 3.3135 + 1.3296* sex + 0.1102*texp -0.03403*genxexp;
run;
axis1 order = (0 to 30 by 10) minor = none label = (" ");
axis2 order = (3.5 to 7 by .5) minor = none label = (" ");
symbol i = join;
proc gplot data = fig4_3;
plot pred*texp = sex /vaxis =axis2 haxis=axis1;
run;
quit;
Table 4.3
Part 1: Intercept only.
This has been done in Chapter 2, Table 2.1.
Part 2: The variable sex is included as a fixed effect.
This has been done in Table 4.1.
Part 3: The variable texp is also included.
proc mixed data = pop1 ; model popular = sex texp / outp = test solution; random intercept /subject = school type=un ; run;
Covariance Parameter Estimates
Cov Parm Subject Estimate
UN(1,1) SCHOOL 0.4860
Residual 0.4599
Fit Statistics
-2 Res Log Likelihood 4444.4
AIC (smaller is better) 4448.4
AICC (smaller is better) 4448.4
BIC (smaller is better) 4453.6
Solution for Fixed Effects
Standard
Effect Estimate Error DF t Value Pr > |t|
Intercept 3.5607 0.1715 98 20.76 <.0001
SEX 0.8447 0.03095 1899 27.29 <.0001
TEXP 0.09345 0.01085 1899 8.61 <.0001
Part 4: This has been done in Table 4.2.
Part 5: This is done in Table 4.2.
Table 4.4 can be produced manually based on the equations provided in this section. We omit the calculation here.
UCLA Researchers are invited to our Statistical Consulting Services
We recommend others to our list of Other Resources for Statistical Computing Help
These pages are Copyrighted (c) by UCLA Academic Technology Services